Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2020 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Pedó, Iara Mouradian
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Vicentin, Maria Cristina G. |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Psicologia: Psicologia Social
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Ciências Humanas e da Saúde
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/23136
|
Resumo: |
The investigation aims to discuss the notion of crisis on the Brazilian Psychiatric Reform context, how it is understood, experienced and devised by the users of Psychosocial Care Centers. Built upon the grounds laid by Institutional Analysis', crisis is taken as an analyser of the Brazilian Psychiatric Reform Movement. The research showed strong signs of this notion of crisis throughout a diverse range of documents - norms, Congress' Reports, manuals and alike - and researches on the mental health field. The core of the study is on the perspectives of people who are users of two Psychosocial Care Centers (CAPS) at São Paulo city which were cultivated through diverse conversation modalities - individual and collective interviews as well as spontaneous conversations at open living spaces. From those conversations, the research draws attention to the main issues of: (1) medication and its pivotal position on the verge of equivalence to crisis or as a trigger to it; (2) hospitalization as the predominant response to it (mainly at the past although persistent at the present) or being regarded as its equivalent and also the night admission and user’s permanence at CAPS in situations understood as crisis; (3) the relationship between crisis, conflicts and aggressiveness such that the stigma of violence falls mostly on people who are accompanied by the Mental Health Services. Other versions (di-versions) unveiled on questioning the notion of crisis are presented and explicit questions on its usage are contemplated. A discussion is made on the role of the critical knowledge of the users throughout the Reform. At last, the research indicates some challenges which are particular to the Mental Health field and some paradoxes are made explicit following the unravel of the various threads that compose the notion of crisis. It is then inquired the persistence of this notion’s usage nowadays, if it should be disassembled or if it is still pertinent to struggle over its critical potential |
