Crise de que(m)? Repensar os sentidos de crise para a construção de um fazer inventivo em saúde mental

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2017
Autor(a) principal: Mota, Mariana Meireles Duarte
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo
BR
Mestrado em Psicologia Institucional
UFES
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia Institucional
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/9020
Resumo: The discussion about the issue of the crisis in Mental Health in this study is an important topic for the Psychiatric Reform movement when it comes to welcoming suffering and producing care that is at liberty. The purpose of this dissertation is to access how mental health professionals in the public service network relate to the reception of the crisis and what effects it has from that. For the accomplishment of this work we used semi-structured interviews, carried out individually with professionals working with mental health in the region of Grande Vitória / ES. The interviews consisted of some questions that could trigger a dialogue on the subject involved. Fragments of the diary were also used as a way of bringing the researcher's experiences to work. Our work consisted in adding so many other questions and analyzes to the discussion related to the reception of the existing crisis in order not to reach a conclusion, a closure about conceptions of crisis, but to understand precisely that of a political interplay of forces that leads to such constitution. We bring to the surface the productive character and some forces involved in the way the crisis is thought. In this way, we observe how certain concepts of crisis, such as dangerousness, are engendered, which emerge against the production of care and acceptance of these people. However, we affirm the process of singling out and welcoming them as health-producing mechanisms and engendering new ways of looking at the crisis.