O caso favela Nova Brasília vs. Brasil : uma leitura interseccional e necropolítica do conceito de segurança cidadã desenvolvido pelo Sistema Interamericano de Proteção aos Direitos Humanos

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2023
Autor(a) principal: Chagas, Natália Nunes
Orientador(a): Ávila, Flávia de
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Pós-Graduação em Direito
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: http://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/17205
Resumo: The research examines citizen security as an alternative to combating police violence in Brazil, with the Case of Favela Nova Brasília vs. Brazil as an example studied to understand the dynamics of selection of a target audience considered an enemy of the State, recipient of a policy of killing, necropolitics, in force under the framework of a state of exception. Therefore, the work is divided into three chapters. The first develops the concept of citizen security, developed in detail in the Report on Citizen Security and Human Rights, issued in 2009 by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. It then discusses juxtapositions and differences between citizen security and public security, with theoretical aspects in the 1988 Constitution that bring them together but that are shown in practice to be different, given the unequal security distribution in the country. Subsequently, data demonstrating the chronic repetition of extrajudicial executions by the police are discussed, most of the vulnerable groups responsible for electing the enemy narrated by the author Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni, among social markers of gender, race, age, and socioeconomic condition. The second chapter enters into the theoretical framework of Michel Foucault's biopolitics to understand how Brazilian police violence develops, using racism as a technology of power to make die or let live. Hence, the theme of racism will be deepened from the perspective of the Cameroonian author Achille Mbembe, directly influenced by the Foucauldian thought that the resourcefulness of an enemy and the State of exception arise intending to legitimize the extermination of the unwanted, the black. The third chapter promotes the interconnection between the first two chapters by studying the Case Favela Nova Brasília vs. Brazil to demonstrate that this was not an isolated situation. The Case portrays two police incursions in 1994 and 1995 in Rio de Janeiro, totaling 26 deaths and acts of sexual violence against three women. For these facts, Brazil was convicted by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in 2017. Next, the chapter was concerned with explaining through intersectionality the process of discrimination existing by the profile of the victims of the Case, mostly black, in order to answer to the following problems: What intersectional aspects involved in the concept of citizen security are verified in the conviction in the Case of Favela Nova Brasília vs. Brazil and how do such aspects contribute to the understanding of Brazilian police performance in terms of citizen security parameters? To this end, the case study method was developed, detailing its primary documents and published journalistic articles, to be a comparative paradigm with the data on other police massacres in Brazil. Therefore, the intersectionality method developed by author Kimberlé Crenshaw was also used, under the juridical-sociological line, to correlate the various social markers present in the Case and criticize the absence in the Inter-American Court's sentence of deepening of police violence and bias. Racism is implemented in the selection of victims. Finally, it concludes that Brazil has difficulties consolidating public security with the citizens.