Concurso de pessoas nos crimes de peculato e corrupção passiva: um estudo sobre a teoria do domínio de organização
Ano de defesa: | 2016 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
UFMG |
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Link de acesso: | http://hdl.handle.net/1843/BUOS-ASMFN2 |
Resumo: | This study scanned the concourse people in relation to the functional crimes of embezzlement and accepting bribes. In dogmatic evolution, the unitary theories have imposed the equalization of all contributions to the typical fact, as opposed to the restrictive theories that make a priori distinction between authors and participants in the crime. From this perspective, it was checked that the restrictive or differentiators theories are compatible with the garantism emanated from the Constitution, especially, among the various concepts, the theory of Claus Roxin people contest, divided into two broad areas: the domain of the fact and breach of duty. In domain of the fact, the German author has pioneered the development of mediate authorship derived from the domain of will per organized power structures, based on the trial of Nazi Adolf Eichmann. It was found that the Supreme Court accepted part of Roxin contributions in criminal lawsuit n. 470 / MG, known as "Case Mensalão". Therefore, was shown the relevance to study the case, once the concourse of people is one of the most controversial chapters of criminal science and embezzlement crimes and passive corruption (bribery) are the central types of criminal protection of the public administration, which impunity is able to generate high costs to society. In this context, Roxins concepts were studied focused in the field of organization, for, in a first step, to ascertain its admissibility in the Brazilian legal system, and in second phase, to examine the relevance of theory in these functional crimes. It deepened in these two studies with a critical appreciation of votes pronounced by the Federal Supreme Court which addressed the issue in the trial of criminal lawsuit n. 470. At the end, we formulated an assertive proposal to solve specific questions, giving rise to the later author contributions Bernd Schünemann, who coined the theory of the levels of the domain fact. |