Coletivização das demandas individuais : as técnicas processuais de julgamento das demandas individuais à luz do princípio do contraditório

• Ano de defesa: 2011
• Autor(a) principal: Pimenta, Natália Martins
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo; BR; Mestrado em Direito Processual; Centro de Ciências Jurídicas e Econômicas; UFES; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito Processual
• Palavras-chave em Português: Individual actions.; Mass actions.; Techniques of judgment.; Contradictory.; Demandas individuais.; Demandas de massa.; Contraditório (Direito).; Processos.; Júri.; Direito Processual Civil; 340
• Link de acesso: http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/2722

The present study analyses the legislative modifications that had introduced procedural techniques of judgment of the individual actions and the contradictory. In such a way it rescues the concepts of procedural target in the different sources treated for the doctrine. Demonstrates the conformation of a new species of social conflict, and, consequently a new form of litigation that congregates individual and collective features jointly. And still portraits the problems faced by the judicial system referring to the amount of processes in course and the inefficiency of the state apparatus to give jurisdiction in time. And observes the inefficacy of the classic procedural models - collective and individual - in respect to the new species of conflict. It demonstrates the importance of the principle of the contradictory for the legitimacy of the decision and its vision under the model of cooperation. It describes, under the Democratic State of Right, the necessity of thinking the process as instrument of effectiveness of the rights foreseen in the constitution. It analyses the techniques of judgment of the individual action and observes that the legislator did not discipline the forms of ingress of the interested parties in order to allow its participation in the litigations whose paradigmatic decision will be done.