Processo penal democrático e ministério público investigador

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2018
Autor(a) principal: Canto Neto, Eduardo Olavo Neves lattes
Orientador(a): Arruda, Eloisa de Sousa
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
Departamento: Faculdade de Direito
País: Brasil
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20863
Resumo: The text basically intends to demonstrate the importance of criminal investigation as an almost always present antecedent of the criminal prosecution in a Democratic State of Law. Based on an interpretation compatible with the constitutional principles, especially with regard to the double face of proportionality and its positive guarantee bias, it was sought to review the main criminal procedural postulates contained in the Major Law. In the sequence, the concept of the criminal investigation activity was approached, approaching its historical aspects, without neglecting its characteristics and purposes. Continuous, it was the origins of the Public Ministry, exclusive holder of the public criminal action, as well as of its structure in the exterior and in Brazil. In this line, considering the current formatting of Parquet, aimed at solving issues relevant to society without the need to be provoked to that extent, notes were drawn up on opposing theses and favorable to ministerial research. In order to bring some concreteness to the ideas exposed, mechanisms of obtaining evidence were indicated, with a brief analysis of those most used in the investigative activity. During the course, there were also brief considerations about the procedural systems, always with the eyes focused on the investigation by the Public Prosecution Service. The objective, quite honestly, was to present a critical and consistent view of the Brazilian reality, including what it says about the limitations that reach the organs in the provision of public services of undoubted relevance