Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2018 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Gattaz, Luciana de Godoy Penteado
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Waisberg, Ivo |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20995
|
Resumo: |
The purpose of this dissertation is to analyse all legal theories regarding shareholders’ agreement binding members of a board of directors, in order to identify which theory seems to be more appropriate from the legal point of view and from the perspective of the development of the market’s dynamic, as well as to verify the necessity to establish limits to such binding. By examining the concepts of corporate interest, shareholders’ agreement, the duties of administrators and controlling shareholder, from the analysis of legal doctrine and in particular from empirical studies and court precedents, there was an effort to ascertain, where corporate governance is concerned, which of the theories is more compatible with the duty to observe the corporate interest, assigned to the administrators and the controlling shareholder by law. After verifying all aspects required to the full understanding of all questions raised in this study, it emerged that the theory that should be adopted is the one favourable to a limited binding of directors to the shareholders’ agreement |
