Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2011 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Fritoli, Fernanda Ghiuro Valentini
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Nunes Júnior, Vidal Serrano |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/5544
|
Resumo: |
This study concerns the legislative omission responsability in face of prejudicial discrimination to fundamental rights and freedoms under the legal system in force. To this end, we tried to analyze both the true meaning and scope of the 5ª, XLI clause of the current Brazilian Constitution and establish the legal consequences for failure in the implementation of this constitutional provision by the Powers concerned, especially by the Legislative. Whereas the constitutional provision under consideration imposes a legal duty to the ordinary legislator - that all legal obligation, once breached, leads to a penalty; that, upon the omission of a constitutional obligation, the omission will be unconstitutional - we briefly present, before we specifically adress to the topic, the instruments of constitutional control of laws and normative acts which exist in our legal system and approach closely, soon after, the mechanisms of constitutional omission control. We provide, also, an overview about the State s responsibility institute and, at last, we specifically adress to State s responsibility front of legislative omission in face of discrimination against fundamental rights and freedoms |
