Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2017 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Moura Junior, Osvaldo
 |
Orientador(a): |
Marques, Oswaldo Henrique Duek |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20517
|
Resumo: |
In front of a globalized social reality that is anchored in technological advances, a profitable ground is created with the advance of unpredictability and risk in antisocial conducts. This change is marked by the proliferation of threats and vulnerabilities that, as a consequence, generates inflows in criminal law. Portion of the legal literature proposes the maintenance of the garantism imputation model, based on the assumptions established by the Frankfurt School, with rigid inflexibility of criminal and procedural guarantees. Nonetheless, this model is not adequate to protect transindividual juridical value, considering that modern criminality incorporates techniques capable of irreversibly deteriorating them. In this thesis, it is intended to clarify the parameters of readjustment of the theory of legal value, aiming at the search for a Criminal Law of Equilibrium that cumulates garantism with effectiveness in imputation. To address this issue, it is necessary to improve these models, through a critical analysis of doctrinal, legislative and jurisprudential studies pertinent to the subject. It was concluded that the linking of the juridical value to the speeds of criminal law in a differential way guarantees specific protections for each type of criminality. The Criminal Law of Equilibrium is obtained through the moderate expansion and administrativization of the criminal system, combining flexibility, guarantism and efficiency in imputation |