Avaliação da condição de saúde de indivíduos pós Covid 19 na atenção primária à saúde

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2023
Autor(a) principal: Cruz, Juliana de Fátima da
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso embargado
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
Brasil
Programa de Pós-graduação em Fisioterapia
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/37612
http://doi.org/10.14393/ufu.di.2023.53
Resumo: COVID 19 is a disease caused by SARS-CoV 2, a virus discovered in China in 2019 that caused the then largest pandemic of the 21st century, causing millions of deaths and many sequelae in individuals affected by the disease, with some of these long-term sequelae duration. This research aims to analyze the quality of life, sleep, mobility and respiratory functions in individuals who were diagnosed with COVID 19 in the city of Uberlândia, assisted by primary care in the north central district. free and informed and only after this first step, they answered the sociodemographic questionnaire, then the Short Form Health Survey (SF 36), Pttsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Clinical Functional Vulnerability Index (IVCF-20) questionnaires and performed the Timed Up and Go (TUG), and manuovacometry., between January 3 and September 15, 2022. The collected data were statistically analyzed demonstrating significance in relation to the quality of life tests in all components, with the capacity functional, pain and general health status comparing robust and frail individuals, components social aspects and limitation by aspects in When comparing frail and at-risk individuals with robust individuals, the vitality component differs from the 3 levels of vulnerability, and mental health has significant values when comparing frail and robust individuals. Regarding sleep quality, there was a statistical difference, showing that individuals aged 60 years or less had better sleep quality results compared to individuals over 60 years old, and the level of vulnerability showed worse sleep quality among frail individuals in compared to individuals at risk of frailty and robust. The values demonstrated in the TUG test show that the longest execution time was for frail individuals and over 60 years old. The difference between the frail aged over 60 years and individuals aged 60 years or less was clearly evident. The values of individuals at risk and the robust ones were not considered significant in the statistics in relation to age, but there was an improvement in the results as the individuals improved their vulnerability. The PI max results show a significant difference between robust individuals comparing ages above 60 years and 60 years or less, and there is no significant difference between frail individuals. The PE max value shows greater differences between frail individuals and ages greater and less than 60 years. Demonstrating that the most fragile individuals had more difficulty in the PE max and the robust individuals had greater differences in the PI max. This research demonstrated statistically significant (p<0,005) changes in the values of PI max, PE max, quality of sleep and life and the vulnerability of individuals in the post-COVID19 period.