Gestão do trabalho em saúde e o programa Desprecariza SUS: estudo comparado do Plano de Carreira, Cargos e Salários em dois municípios da Grande São Paulo

• Ano de defesa: 2017
• Autor(a) principal: Santos, Eliziane Jacqueline dos [UNIFESP]
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
• Palavras-chave em Português: “Desprecariza SUS” Program; Continuing education; Management of healthcare work; Managerial reform; Evaluation of performance; Personnel management; Desprecariza SUS; Educação permanente; Gestão do trabalho em saúde; PCCS; Reforma gerencial; Avaliação de desempenho; Administração de recursos humanos em saúde; Saúde coletiva
• Link de acesso: https://sucupira.capes.gov.br/sucupira/public/consultas/coleta/trabalhoConclusao/viewTrabalhoConclusao.jsf?popup=true&id_trabalho=5157537; http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/41872

Objective: The main objective of this work was to analyze how develops health work management in the light of the PCCS, comparing with the guidelines established by the Ministry of Health for the preparation of the PCCS and the “Desprecariza Sus” Program in two municipalities of Greater São Paulo. Methods: This was a qualitative research, using the bibliographical research; documentary and field, and of techiniques for data collection, such as semi-structured interviews with the managers of SMS search and focus groups with health professionals to working in UBS and hospital. The data analysis took into account the proposal of the content analysis of Bardin, from thematic core, core of meaning and the categories objects of study. Results: The PCCS of the studied municipal districts meet the Nacional Guidelines of PCCS, contemplating the premises “Desprecariza SUS” ind the fight against precarious link. However, the PCCS is little known by the severs, in addition to weaknesses in the evolution of criteria about the server the performance evaluation and permanent education policies, perceived as assumptions of valuation and recognition of professional by MS. It was noted also that there are differences in the treatment of statutory and “celetistas” servers, non-inclusion of categories the health; the non-recognition of the qualification/training as one of the pillars for development, generating therefore, dissatisfaction and frustration with regard to personnel policies practiced in both municipalities. Conclusion: The PCCS of the studied municipal districts do not consider the working condition as key factor to personal policies and that in a way, make up the everyday professional and impact directly on performance evaluation and professional progression, even though discussion with the premises of “Desprecariza SUS”. The possibilities of deplouing a PCCS allowing the recognition and the professional valuation shoud be reconsidered from the different social actors, not only in search of evolution, but in the fight against any factor of precariousness of work relationships. Unite political will and the debate on the ways to make personnel policy in the SUS is the first step to treat health career like as a professional and stable project.