Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2011 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Silva, Eder Amaral e
 |
Orientador(a): |
Ferreri, Marcelo de Almeida
 |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Sergipe
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Pós-Graduação em Psicologia Social
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://ri.ufs.br/handle/riufs/6011
|
Resumo: |
Among those who fell in love for the life of cities, urbanesas earn as many names as it features: invisible cities , subjective cities , muses of the streets , one-way street . Based on the reports created by some of those lovers, we draw the face of urbanesas, as a composition procedure that incorporates what these dreamers tell us. The urbanesas personify three tensions or problems, having the city as landscape: the tension between poverty of experience and the urban everyday life; the deviation s affective strength from exacerbated utilitarianism and privatism in the administration of contemporary cities; and, finally, the relationship between writing and city, literature and thought. By the combination of the referential arrangement and literary, cinematic, philosophic and photographic images, we followed the trail of three urbanesas that, under the impulse that animates each one, so were baptized: EXPERIENCE, STUBBORNESS and WRITING. The story that goes through the urbanesas unfolds around the mismatch between EXPERIENCE and EVERYDAY LIFE in the city. It is a research which the procedure consists in to take the concepts as characters and the analysis as storyline; from that we obtain, literally, conceptual plots. In this way of researching, an erratic line passes between the narrative and analytic trace. However it does not separate them, it embarrasses them. Assuming the research itself as the practice of the subjective restoration of the city, the composition of writings - or risks - does not refer the city as a totality, but as a profusion of experiences that does not last or root; nevertheless, it remains leaving their vestiges recorded in scattered writings everywhere, as restoration exercises of the urban experience. Before and beyond of an language experiment, the intersection of narrative with the problematizations of the urban experience is the very act by which the concepts and questions reverberates themself. It is to take the risks of the city as problematizations lines and restoration of urban experience. What is in question here is the betting in the usage of images which are able to make you desire in the same city, another city. |