Uma comparação entre os discursos das reformas da Previdência dos governos Cardoso e Lula

• Ano de defesa: 2013
• Autor(a) principal: Freitas, Felipe Corral de
• Orientador(a): Mendonça, Daniel de
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Pelotas
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência Política
• Departamento: Ciência Política
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Reforma; Teoria do discurso; Antagonismo; Partidos políticos
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Teform; Theory of discourse; Antagonism; Political parties
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::CIENCIA POLITICA
• Link de acesso: http://guaiaca.ufpel.edu.br/handle/123456789/1538

The aim of this study was to analyze the discourse of deputies of the PT and the PSDB, performed during the Great Expedient Section of Congress, dealing with security reforms undertaken in Cardoso and Lula. For this analysis we used the theoretical and methodological aspects of discoursetheory of Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe, in order to identify the significations and the meanings generated by those deputies to refer the reforms. In this sense,you see the discursive relationship between parliamentarians from both parties and, in addition, will be demonstrated variation of parliamentary discourse in relation tothe two reforms, other words, how they positioned themselves in relation to reforms -highlighting the position in that political parties were, now in the situation, sometimes in opposition. The main hypothesis guiding this dissertation is that there is no so clear ideological differentiation between parliamentarians of the PT and the PSDB, being marked by an antagonistic separation between government and opposition