O etnodesenvolvimento como questão de justiça ecológica : aliando demandas indígenas à proteção da natureza

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2020
Autor(a) principal: Farias, Douglas Loroza
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso
Brasil
Faculdade de Direito (FD)
UFMT CUC - Cuiabá
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: http://ri.ufmt.br/handle/1/4551
Resumo: The justification of the elements that should guide a legal regime that values both the protection of nature and ethnodevelopment is one of the greatest challenges to be faced by Environmental Law nowadays. To this end, the concept of ethnodevelopment is initially exposed, its relationship with the new indigenous demands for integration with the market and its protection, as a result of the broadest protection constitutionally conferred on indigenous cultures. Through this exhibition, the need for Environmental Law to dialogue with the real indigenous and no longer with stereotypes is pointed out. International experiences are then presented, in which Environmental Law establishes a this kind of dialogue, focusing on the American Continent: the greening of the Inter-American System for the Protection of Human Rights and Ecuador's nature rights. These two experiences are complemented by the one occurred in New Zealand, which combines the recognition of the rights of nature with complex structures of business law for the economic exploitation of indigenous territories. The theoretical framework of ecological justice with a focus on capabilities, by Schlosberg, is presented, relating the dimension of recognition of this theory of justice with the negotial aproach to self-determination of indigenous peoples and with the content of art. 231 of the Brazilian Constitution. The protection of ecological integrity through a curator State, also arising from this theoretical framework, is related to the duty to protect art. 225. Finally, it is concluded that ecological integrity is both a condition and a limiting factor for ethnodevelopment and that an ethnodevelopment that respects ecological integrity may give rise to different interpretations of the idea of conservation: ethnoconservation¸ which should be encouraged, especially in indigenous territories, by the pluralist spirit of the Brazilian Constitution.