Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2023 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
CERQUEIRA, Carlos Guilherme Moraes
 |
| Orientador(a): |
BOTTENTUIT JUNIOR, João Batista
|
| Banca de defesa: |
BOTTENTUIT JUNIOR, João Batista
,
RODRIGUES, Sannya Fernanda Nunes
,
CERUTTI, Elisabete
|
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal do Maranhão
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM CULTURA E SOCIEDADE/CCH
|
| Departamento: |
DEPARTAMENTO DE EDUCAÇÃO II/CCSO
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tedebc.ufma.br/jspui/handle/tede/4652
|
Resumo: |
The research work is carried out through a systematic literature review type analysis, which consists of surveying scientific productions in this case, master's dissertations and doctoral theses, in Portuguese, in the period from 2017 to 2021 on experiences empirical studies with the theme of Project-Based Learning (PBL) in higher education. This methodology consists of bringing to the classroom the proposition of real life projects, situations that the student will encounter in their daily lives and that they will develop the skills and abilities necessary for their resolution. In short, it works with what the student already knows, what he is learning and what he will learn through a project idealized, planned and executed in the classroom. We analyzed 144 scientific productions collected between March and April 2022, in theses and dissertations repositories: Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (BDTD) and Open Access Scientific Repository of Portugal (RECAAP). In this systematic review study, we aimed to raise the following results: the negative and positive points in the application of the PBL methodology, the evaluation of teachers and the possible technologies used. The analysis procedure collected the following data from the works: author, year, institution, title, keywords, nature of the work, type of research, description, participants, results obtained, difficulties, methodology, evaluation, type of project adopted . Then these data were analyzed following the guiding questions: What were the results obtained? What is the evaluation used by the teacher? What are the positives and negatives? What technology is adopted? After gathering the data, the Voyant Tools application was used to perform a meta analysis of the research corpus in order to identify relevant statistical patterns. At the end of the research, a compilation of the main resources and good practices in the implementation of the methodology materialized in an e-book delivered as a research product. |
