Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2019 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Cunha, Marcelo Perini Peralta
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Britto, Pedro Dultra
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Britto, Pedro Dultra,
Amaral, Camilo Vladimir de Lima,
Fonseca, Carolina Ferreira da |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Goiás
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Projeto e Cidade (FAV)
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Artes Visuais - FAV (RG)
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/9569
|
Resumo: |
The present work focuses on analyzing picho as a form of urban intervention distinct from others such as graffiti and street art. We first approach this separation between graffiti and picho that occurs only in Brazil. We analyze how they are activities that have a paradoxical relationship where graffiti is accepted as a legitimate work of art and transformed into another cultural commodity of the cities, as well as a way of acting in the urban environment to promote its valorization, while picho refuses to follow this line and remain deliberately illegal, constantly questioning the public character of our cities and their strategic marketing management. By doing so, it is an undeniably political act of contesting the way cities are managed today and how they can be appropriated by their citizens. |
