Estado e população carcerária: conflito em torno de uma soberania precária

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2019
Autor(a) principal: Reis, Gabriel de Castro Borges lattes
Orientador(a): Franco, Michele Cunha lattes
Banca de defesa: Franco, Michele Cunha, Costa, Alexandre Bernardino, Cruz, João da
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Goiás
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-graduação em Direitos Humanos (PRPG)
Departamento: Pró-Reitoria de Pós-graduação (PRPG)
País: Brasil
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/10362
Resumo: This dissertation investigates the existing relations between the Brazilian State and its prison population, proposing a theoretical discussion on the theme, using the bibliography review and documentary analysis. Through the creation and study of the categories Idealized State (EI) and Realized State (ER), the Brazilian Realized State category and the possibility of its subsumption to the concept of State of Exception are analyzed (AGAMBEM, 2004; 2007). The research also studies the conditions of incarceration of the Provisional Prison House (CPP) of Aparecida de Goiânia (GO), as well as reflections on the convergences and divergences between the EI and the Brazilian RE regarding the promotion and protection of rights, addressing also the relativistic and absolute theories of punishment. The prison group Primeiro Comando da Capital (PCC) is analyzed, focusing on its motto (Peace, Justice, Freedom, Equality and Union), through a bibliographic review seeking to point out divergences and convergences in the group's performance, based on the split of the object between PCC-Idealized (PCC-I) and PCC-Realized (PCC-R). The study demonstrates that Agambem's concepts do not apply to the relations between the Brazilian Realized State and its prison population, since the theoretical discussion held pointed to the occurrence of consensus sovereignty (GRAHAM, 2015).