Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2021 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Faria, Juliete Prado de
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Siqueira, José do Carmo Alves
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Siqueira, José do Carmo Alves,
Arruda, André Felipe Soares de,
Martini, Sandra Regina |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Goiás
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Direito Agrário (FD)
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito - FD (RMG)
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/12583
|
Resumo: |
This research addresses the right of Quilombola Peoples to Consultation and Prior, Free and Informed Consent. The Convention 169 recognizes the right of Indigenous and Tribal Peoples to be consulted, whether or not to reach consent, whenever any legislative, administrative or judicial measure by the State affects their rights. Through observing the concrete cases presented, it is clear that the Brazilian State does not materialize the right to Consultation and Prior, Free and Informed Consent. In this scenario, Indigenous, Quilombolas and other Traditional Peoples began to build Community Protocols, mainly to “tell” the State the rules that must be obeyed in the Consultation processes. From these considerations, the following question arises: Is it possible to enforce the right to Prior Consultation in Brazil, as a Modern State, based on the norms emanating from the Peoples themselves? The general objective of the research is to understand the possibility - or impossibility - of coexistence between the Modern State and the Pluralisms in Brazil, with regard to the right to Consultation and Prior, Free and Informed Consent. Specifically, we intend to: a) carry out a literary review about the modernity and colonization european of Latin America, as defining the current conflicts involving Quilombola Peoples, with a focus on Brazil, as well as understanding the right to territory as a pillar of support for all rights of these Peoples; b) understand the experience of these Peoples in the construction of the Community Protocols in Brazil and; c) understand the main conflicts involving the Kalunga People and the construction of their consultation protocol.The theoretical framework that guided this work is Rita Laura Segato's studies on coloniality, capitalism and patriarchy. The methodology is constructed from an empirical research, using the comprehensive interview method, a concept developed by Jean-Claude Kaufmann. |
