A (in)tangibilidade da coisa julgada perante decisão de inconstitucionalidade : uma análise do parágrafo 15 do artigo 525 do Código de Processo Civil

• Ano de defesa: 2017
• Autor(a) principal: Lyra, João Paulo Barbosa
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo; BR; Mestrado em Direito Processual; Centro de Ciências Jurídicas e Econômicas; UFES; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito Processual
• Palavras-chave em Português: Positive law; Decision of the Federal Supreme Court; Constitutionality control; res judicata; Direito positivo; Decisão do Supremo Tribunal Federal; Coisa julgada; Controle da constitucionalidade; Juízes - Decisões - Retroatividade; Processo civil - Brasil; Direito Processual Civil; 340
• Link de acesso: http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/8842

The main goal of this dissertation is to analyze the compatibility of paragraph 15 of Article 525 of the Code of Civil Procedure with the Brazilian Legal Order. From the theoretical model of logico-semantic constructivism, Law is understood as a set of rule of laws and cultural object constituent by its own realities by means of deontic speech act. To each production of legal norm there is a new legal system in a certain time. Legal security safeguards legal facts that occur in each of the legal system , ensuring the maintenance of the legal relationships created by Law. In order to protect the Federal Constitution, the constituent created forms of constitutionality control which will be proceeded either in a diffuse way, or in a concentrated way, not having hierarch between these two forms. From this perspective, the concept of res judicata is set from its normative structure as well as fundamental right guaranteed by the Federal Constitution of 1988. This theoretical and legislative panorama support the conclusion by the unconstitutionality of the provision in the Code of Civil Procedure of 2015.