Controle de constitucionalidade e coisa julgada em matéria tributária

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2024
Autor(a) principal: Toledo, Maria Danielle Rezende de lattes
Orientador(a): Bueno, Cassio Scarpinella lattes
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito
Departamento: Faculdade de Direito
País: Brasil
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/41312
Resumo: This dissertation aims to analyze the institutes of res judicata and the control of constitutionality, restricting itself to tax matters, especially in view of the judgment of Extraordinary Appeals Nos. 949.297/CE and 955.227/BA, which deal specifically with the impacts of the control of constitutionality of Law No. 7.689/88, which establishes the Social Contribution on Profits (CSL), in the face of res judicata obtained by taxpayers recognizing the unconstitutionality of the tax requirement at a time prior to the analysis by the Federal Supreme Court. We will analyze the construction of precedents since the constitutionalization of law and procedure, including for the formation of jurisprudential law. We will address the grounds for defending the preservation of res judicata - the effects of the Supreme Court's understanding - and, finally, we will address the role of the National Treasury Attorney's Office in constructing the winning thesis to determine the cessation of the effects of res judicata based on the control of constitutionality with erga omnes and binding effects