Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2012 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Viafore, Daniele
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Tesheiner, José Maria Rosa
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/4196
|
Resumo: |
This work analyses the repetitive actions in brazilian law and a proposal of an incident of repetitive demands resolution, provided for the articles 930 to 941 of the new Civil Procedure Code Law project 8.046/2010, currently under discussion at the Chamber of Deputies. The economy of scale and speed of the commercial transactions through modern communications means made at the judiciary numbers high level of identical individual process. The lawsuit has suffered changes both quantitative, and qualitative. Forensic practice has detected real violations to the principle of due process in the treatment of repetitive actions, once the judiciary has proved inefficient for provide the judicial protection of effective form. Considering the majority of actions brought to the judiciary are repetitive, in which are discussion of questions of identical rights, so several procedural reforms and mechanisms of filters in order to reduce the volume of processes and resources, give speed in its processing and avoid the development of processes that have already been thoroughly valued by the Judiciary. However, it appears that the procedural reforms have not been sufficient to counteract the gloom. So, the Federal Senate opted for preparation of a new Code of Civil Procedure. With this intention and aiming to confer greater rationality judicial and reconcile vertically judicial decisions, it is proposed an incident resolution demand of repetitive. The proposal is to establish decision-paradigm with content of standard general and abstract spanning identical question of rights, whose implementation by judicial bodies competent is compulsory. The society is anxious for a procedural system that guarantees justice with efficiency and speed. In the current situation experienced by the Judiciary, the proposal of an incident of resolution of repetitive demands seems to be an instrument to print more uniformity and better rationality in judicial activity. The jurisdiction will not make it possible for the maintenance of different solutions to similar cases, which foster increased delay procedural and legal uncertainty. However, observing the extraprocedural factors that also contribute to the delay in the solution of legal disputes, such initiative can be taken as a contribution to the improvement in the performance of the judicial sector |
