Os processos identitários do professor : quais os sentidos atribuídos a suas práticas educativas e a sua formação profissional em universidades públicas e privadas do município de Aracaju/SE?

• Ano de defesa: 2016
• Autor(a) principal: Rodrigues, Ana Beatriz Garcia Costa
• Orientador(a): Stobäus, Claus Dieter
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação
• Departamento: Escola de Humanidades
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Identidade Docente; Práticas Docentes; Ensino Universitário; Mal-estar Docente; Identidade Narrativa
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO
• Link de acesso: http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/7330

This research aims to analyze, through life stories of professors who work in two universities, one public and one private, in Aracaju-SE, the personal and professional identity processes and the meanings attributed by them to their educational practices. We do not consider here the identity as static, motionless, but as a mobile, fluid and multifaceted process. In Theoretical we opted for a reasoned way in the psychological and sociological knowledge about the identity and the theoretical assumptions of Paul Ricoeur´s Narrative Identity. We sought, in the narratives of the professors, to understand how professional and institutional demands practices influence their identity processes. For this, we used the narrative interview to unveil training and teaching activities in professors from public and private universities in the state of Sergipe, bringing to light the choices, the meanings and the challenges faced in their formation processes and the construction of the teacher identity. Thus the following guiding questions were used: how is the identity of the public and private school professors constituted in higher education institutions? How do these professors build their practices in public and private spheres of IES? How do the realities and demands of these institutions interfere in the building of this professor identity? What are the main sources of malaise and welfare in public and private institutions? Analysis of the interviews were based on theoretical assumptions of Paul Ricoeur, specifically the concept and theories about narrative identity. It was observed that the teaching of experiences in the public and private spheres are very different, because the demands and institutional profiles are disparate. Thus, it was found in the private sphere that the narratives of professors included aspects that relate directly and/or indirectly to the capitalist logic of the present higher education in private institutions. In the public sphere, there have been reports regarding the great bureaucratic demand and the fierce competition between colleagues. From the analysis using Ricoeur, the following categories were developed: The choice to be teaching; the construction of the teaching practices and the relationship between the teaching practices and the construction of the identity of these professors. In elaborate discussions, it is clear that the identity processes of these professors, that the fluidity and mobility of the identity of each, is manifested in the constant needs of adjustments and readjustments that the environment imposes on them. Thus, interfaces between teaching practices, institutional contexts and teacher identity are present in all the narrative passages analyzed in this work. The strategies used to deal with the institutional and social demands, the meanings attributed to their professional and their personal experiences practices, reflections and reinterpretation are the result of identity transformations undergone by these professors.