A aplicação da teoria do fato consumado às tutelas sumárias concedidas contra o Poder Público

• Ano de defesa: 2016
• Autor(a) principal: Cavalcanti Neto, Antonio de Moura
• Orientador(a): Bueno, Cassio Scarpinella
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
• Departamento: Faculdade de Direito
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Tutelas sumárias; Poder Público; Fato consumado; Modernidade líquida; Teoria dos princípios; Falta de juridicidade; Justificação normativa; Argumentação democrática
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Summary injunction; Public Power; Accomplished fact; Liquid modernity; Theory of the principles; Lack of legality; Justification rules; Democratic argument
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
• Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6971

This paper aims to discuss mainly the legality of the theory of the accomplished fact. The jurisprudence always refers to such theory as an exceptional circumstance, but it is not enough to close the debate regarding the issue. On the contrary, it is important to stress that the exceptional being has nothing to do with being legal. This argument has been only used in lawsuits filed against Public authorities, which demonstrates that, in cases where the public authority is not the defendant, there would be no accomplished fact. This conception indicates clearly that the legal institutions that permeate the debate about accomplished fact have been inserted in the context of liquid modernity , in which the rigid rules of behavior give way to personal desires of each agent. The problem is more serious when the debate involves decisions issued by the Judiciary, once, in a democratic State, such decisions cannot prevail on the Legislative Power s expressions. Concerning the issue subject of this paper, the manifestations of the Legislative Power are clear and fruitful: regulate the summary injunction with depth as well as the juridical fact. If the current jurisprudence has a penchant for removal of these concepts clearly defined in the name of principles, there is no way to note something about the accomplished fact without making a foray brief about the theory of principles discussed in the works of Humberto Avila, Marcelo Neves, Robert Alexy and Ronald Dworkin. If this is essential, so is the definition of what is an accomplished fact, that is and how the natural, physical or social events are held in the legal world without any normative implications (chronological time, the practice of acts during the term the summary trust, good faith in the action of the measure applicant and so forth). After this time, the argument of the accomplished fact has to be compared with the corresponding assumptions and with those established by the jurisprudence itself, in an analytical study to allow, with some confidence, understand what effectively it comes and keeps compatibility with the juridical discourses rationality. Based on the analysis made in this paper, it is allowed a clear conclusion towards the lack of legality of the theory the accomplished fact, which it should not be relied upon in the litigations against the Public authorities for suffering from lack of normative justification and democratic argument. It is an argument of authority, subjective and uncontrollable that, without a critical perspective, can preserve the legal system situations that are remarkably strange