Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2007 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Abraão, Eduardo Lysias Maia |
| Orientador(a): |
Coelho, Fábio Ulhoa |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/7805
|
Resumo: |
The present essay provides law practitioners with an opportunity to widely reflect about shareholders agreement in Brazil. It offers subsides that facilitate a better understanding of this institute, while it points out distinctions between nominated or typical and innominated or atypical models. It presents legal subsidies that contribute with the legal-technical analysis that tends to the solution of controversies related to the issue, especially controversies involving shareholders agreements whose purpose is innominated or atypical. It searches to establish the notion of formal and material elements that limit the shareholders agreement framework as typical and/or atypical, trying to differentiate them with the aim of giving them an appropriated legal treatment. It analyzes mixed shareholders agreements, taking into consideration their simultaneous typical and atypical nature, in which case it recommends the methodological segregation of the legal analysis of such agreements. Finally, it realizes that the regulation of certain shareholders agreements under the Brazilian law does not preclude the occurrence of atypical shareholders agreements, whose legal framework is not specific, but instead is based upon general legal guidelines, what implies in a distinct legal treatment thereof |
