Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2009 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Mellim Filho, Oscar
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Passetti, Edson |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Ciências Sociais
|
| Departamento: |
Ciências Sociais
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/4081
|
Resumo: |
It is an analysis of the Brazilian judiciary penal system, more specifically the action of prosecutors and judges as operators of the law and responsible for a significant part/portion of the penal selectivity that the system realizes through the empirical exam of criminal processes in appeal at the court of justice and at the extinct criminal jurisdiction tribunal of the state of São Paulo as an exemplar universe. The hypothesis to be verified is of the relevant role of the judiciary practice at managing the penal system, verified on the work of these operators of the Law at the construction of the crime and of the criminal. This selection is made not only through the Brazilian Criminal Code, but also by utilizing the tools available within the study of Law, used during the process of obtaining the truth behind facts classified as criminal and the judgment of the defendant. The analysis of the selectivity verifies the asymmetry in political treatment of people, accused of portraying certain crimes, sheltered under the universality of the devices of the science of the Law, including the application and individualization procedure of the sentences, serving itself from the criminal dogmatic categories, and, in an expressive way, from the juridical hermeneutics, culminating with the conclusion that the abolishment of selectivity means the abolition of sentences and the idea that punishment and pain, as a way to introduce new forms of conflict solving, far beyond the universality of the Law, with emphasis in the interests of the people and concrete situations |
