Percepções de professores de Matemática a respeito da inclusão

• Ano de defesa: 2013
• Autor(a) principal: Vasconcelos, Silvia Cristina Ravasio
• Orientador(a): Manrique, Ana Lúcia
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Educação Matemática
• Departamento: Educação
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Inclusão; Percepções; Professores de Matemática; Escola básica
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Inclusion; Perceptions; Math teachers; Basic school
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS EXATAS E DA TERRA::MATEMATICA
• Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/10966

The present paper had the objective of identifying the perceptions of the teachers who teach Mathematics concerning the inclusion of students with deficiency in a regular classroom. It was developed through a descriptive research with Mathematics teachers from the Fundamental I, Fundamental II and High School. A hundred ninety seven teachers from São Paulo state took part in the research. We used a questionay as a research tool. Our theoretical reference was based on the meanings and suppositions of the integration and inclusion paradigms. The data were analized through two kinds of statistics procedures: a descriptive uni and bidimensional statistics and a multidimensional analysis, related to the CHIC (Classificação Hierárquica Implicativa e Coesiva / Implicative and Coesitive Hierarquic Classification). According to the analysis of the data we could notice that the major part of the teachers who answered the questionary did not participate in enabling activities and they did not have in their inicial formation, not even in the continuous one, an effective work related to education for inclusion. We identified that in most part os the schools of the teachers who answered the questionary there are no assistant technology and pedagogical material for the work with students with deficiency, and when there are such things, they are not enough. The teachers who answered the questionary were favorable to the inclusion and to the benefit that it provides to the students with and without deficiency, to their relatives, to their teachers and to their communities when it concerns light and moderate deficiencies. When we dealt with more severe deficiencies there was a division of opinions among the teachers who agreed and who did not agree, altough there was no conviction on their positions