Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2013 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Pacheco, Beatriz de Almeida
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Costa, Rogério da |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Comunicação e Semiótica
|
| Departamento: |
Comunicação
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/4513
|
Resumo: |
This research discusses the issue of the experiences offered by digital devices from its interfaces and interactions in the context of ICTs, and aims to answer the following question: is it possible to create a set of heuristics based on externalist theories of philosophy of mind (Embodiment and Enaction) that contributes to the Interaction Design area development. As a hypothesis, I work toward a positive answer to the presented question, whereas from these interactions each person sets a differentiated cognitive and learning relationship, which makes his cognitive channels more complex. With the daily unique products launch and complex behavior, due to the technology advancement, people have to deal with new codes, which need some kind of learning. Considering a world increasingly represented by images, the visibility provided by machines becomes extremely important to construct reality, especially in Western cities and developed regions. This is replaced by a value of reality, since it is less susceptible to the subjectivity of the human eye. It points to the important connections between the individual experiences and their links to his repertoire acquired throughout life as a key to the process of knowledge construction. Finally it indicates that digital devices, while providing multichannel and multisensory interaction ends up favoring the establishment of such relations. Thus, part of the concept of experience (Varela and Maturana -‐ the new look at our bodies able to see both physical structures and lived experiential structures) transits through its unique characteristics of, individuality and cognitive plurality. Secondly discusses the interaction between men and computers from their development paradigms: presents the area development in the facer of its history and introduces the art state of the projected area, instinctively or intentionally, experiences create knowledge. It deals, afterwards, with the communication and the communicative processes mediated by digital devices, discusses the design of their interfaces and the interactive possibilities in the light of the Interaction Design (Preece et al), Human Machine Interaction (Benyon) and Design of Experiment (Shedroff) -‐ which increasingly consider the user as the center of the design process and the construction. Finally discusses the Experience as a contemporary form of learning that moves between the singular universal knowledge and the experimentation |
