Administração pública, litigiosidade e juridicidade: a importância da Advocacia pública para o exercício da função administrativa

• Ano de defesa: 2014
• Autor(a) principal: Madureira, Claudio Penedo
• Orientador(a): Beznos, Clovis
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
• Departamento: Faculdade de Direito
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Direito Administrativo; Administração Pública; Função administrativa; Legalidade; Juridicidade; Interesse público; Advocacia pública; Controle jurídico da atividade administrativa
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Administrative Law; Public administration; Administrative activity; Legality; Juridicity; Public interest; Public Law; Law Control of administrative activity
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
• Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6437

I focus the problem of litigation in the legal process, but under the view of needed compatibility of administrative acting in the boundaries imposed by positive-law order to the State intervention in the range of legal possibilities of the citizen. The discussion proposed here is important because the State, as an organic element of political institutionalization of a society supports in all its aspects several possibilities and claims that lead it to legal litigations dayly. The fact is that Public Administration and its agents are subject to the rules of written legality (here understood as juridicity in order to cover the following of rules that are part of the Constitution) and have their activities linked to the achievement of public interest (here understood as State and society interest observing the established juridical order). This finding is of crucial importance for understanding the litigation problem in the public field, since the incidence of strict legality and need of public interest achievement condition the state activity to a correct application do Law. The achievement of this purpose presupposes interpretative activity and not always the public agents are prepared to act, which explains diversity in the basis of professional training that are part of the Administration. Like this problems outcome in the realization of necessary acts to the administrative functions, based on mistakes in the Law application. It may happen that Administration denies usufruct to subjective rights by order or from it imposes the administered people obligations and punishment not authorized by the normative terms. These mistakes need to be corrected by Administration under the hazard and risk of inferring offense to strict legality and of not promoting properly the achievement of public interest. The importance of Public Advocacy and its participants is here to whom the Constitution (articles 131 e 132) gives assistance to the public service in the administrative processes by means of which these professionals can have the internal control of juridicity of the administrative acting (article 70). As a consequence of this juridical control, when acts practiced by the Administration contradicts Law, the public lawyers must direct their review in the administrative range. It is their duty to use tools that are given to them to promote the anticipation of litigious demand closure that the validity of these same acts are discussed, for example, not presenting defense or legal resources and promoting conciliation in the process. These elements lead to the conclusion that it is incompatible to the administrative law system, specially to the strict legality and with the need of achieving public interest, the understanding according to which it is for the public lawyers , as professionals of the linked legal activity support the unsustainable or question the unquestionable in the processes they are linked to