Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2012 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Silva, Diógenes Pires da
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Pugliesi, Marcio |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/5798
|
Resumo: |
Abstract This aims to study the phenomenon of the introduction and enforcement of the rules by the legal system, in particular regarding the planning of country, it is necessary for both the study of the three requirements of the rule of law, namely, validity, performance and effectiveness. Since that is the formal validity under the rules of the positivist theory of planning which validators verify the requirements for the making and introduction of the standard, rather, a norm to be introduced in order to be another standard that already exists in order to sustain new sustaining standard of validity, previously existing rule that it empowers (determine jurisdiction) to someone and imposes other requirements. The effectiveness is covered by "animus" of society to accept the norm, and the State in making the standard should be applied as an example of the use of seat belts, the standard has existed for years in the Brazilian requiring the use of safety equipment in vehicles, on motorcycles helmets, seat belts in cars, but one part of society in its majority are not aware of the existence of seat belts and on the other hand the state does not supervise the use of seat belts was a conduit laws against mere custom. However, in São Paulo city was established a standard that required the use of seat belts, at first glance, it would be like if society did not observe that the reason why this would respect? The reason was one, the other end of effectiveness, returning to enforce in the case was the city of São Paulo decided to all staff that oversees the transit, warned and fined the offenders completed today the use of seat belts in Sao Paulo is a habit, unquestioned. Finally we have the force, establishing the standard that is already in the system after the requisite validity, then looks up at what time the standard will be applied, at what point is that it will be effective or better when applied and even when they are applied, there are few rules and term date for the beginning and end of established early in its development. The rule is that standards have requirement beginning and its end would occur in two cases with loss of effectiveness and with the advent of the new standard. Our study focuses on the latter hypothesis, which occurs when someone becomes the norm to regulate matters similar to yours? The rule says that this rule is repealed. But the repeal of the rule implies the removal of town or just stops its operation. At this time the figure appears to be working in this dissertation is to reinstate, which is the phenomenon that occurs when a provision repealing a previous one is withdrawn or lost their effect, that other old rules repealed, the land rises or not? And what are the effects and opportunities for both |
