Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2016 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Morais, Carlos Eduardo Corrêa de
 |
| Orientador(a): |
João, Paulo Sérgio |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/18861
|
Resumo: |
This paper has as main scope to identify and establish the consequences arising from the delayed analysis of the necessary requirements for acceptance of the reviews appeals that were discontinued by the Regional Labor Court, proceeding that will take place only after the appeal that represents the dispute is judged by the Superior Labor Court, in accordance with the Law No. 13,015, of July 21, 2014, which included the Article 896-C in the Brazilian Labor Code, regulated by the Act No. 491/SEGJUD.GP of September 23, 2014, deep diving into the possibility of applying a predominant thesis or Court Precedent to the discontinued appeals or without the proper observance of the legal requirements established in the legal model. Therefore, it firstly presents the main relevant characteristics of the res judicata and the cases in which there is irradiation effects with their flexibility, followed by the analysis of the judgment of the repeated appeal to determine, with proportionality, weighing the constitutional principles of legal security and isonomy, in thesis, colliding with the proposed analysis. The considerations presented are anchored in doctrine, as well as recent and controversial understanding of Regional Labor Courts and Superior Labor Court on the subject. By last, the conclusions are intended to systematize those cases where even not admitting an appeal, should be overcome formal obstacle, perhaps the immutability arising from the final judgment, so that the stir receives similar solution as established by the Superior Labor Court |
