Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2022 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Maduro, Priscila Simeão Silva
![lattes](/bdtd/themes/bdtd/images/lattes.gif?_=1676566308) |
Orientador(a): |
Oliveira, Maria Rosa Duarte de
![lattes](/bdtd/themes/bdtd/images/lattes.gif?_=1676566308) |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Literatura e Crítica Literária
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de Filosofia, Comunicação, Letras e Artes
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/25995
|
Resumo: |
Latin American literature has become an important place of memory to reflect on the military dictatorships that marked the countries in this region. This discourse is filled with cracks in a history that is still in the process of being prepared and that demands the creation of new possibilities for rebuilding the past. There is a glimpse of a post-dictatorial generation of writers who were brought up under the dictatorship and who resist the official discourse of oppression. This research seeks to reflect on the poetic-literary devices they betake in Patricio Pron's O espírito dos meus pais continua a subir na chuva (2018) and Julián Fuks' A Resistência (2015) as ways of resistance. The proposed answer is that the works resist for the strategy of autofiction and potency as the presence of deprivation in the discourse gaps. To Pron's novel, add the anarchiving, which disintegrates the archive. In Fuks, the work is conceived through an invented memory, interspersed with events supported by reality. The research carried out here has as theoretical presuppositions the studies of Raul Antelo and Márcio Seligmann-Silva regarding the anarchiving, as well as Diana Klinger's reflections on autofiction literary works and Giorgio Agamben's assumptions regarding potency. The final considerations show that both novels confirm the raised hypothesis, showing they resist through the devices of autofiction, potency, anarchiving and fictionalization of memory |