Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2023 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Bandicioli, Sarah do Carmo
 |
Orientador(a): |
Garcia, Maria
 |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/39415
|
Resumo: |
This study aims to investigate how digital judicial processes can promote equal access to the justice system for black individuals and reduce historical inequalities. Creating a more just and equitable society for black people involves various aspects, including equal and relational access to the justice system and the implementation of measures that address historical and structural inequalities. Digital judicial processes can serve as an important tool in this regard, provided they are implemented carefully and inclusively. Digital judicial procedures involve the use of information and communication technologies to conduct legal proceedings electronically. This can include online platforms for filing petitions, accessing documents, and conducting virtual hearings. For black individuals, digital judicial processes could bring several advantages. Firstly, they can facilitate access to justice by eliminating physical and geographical barriers. This is particularly important for individuals living in remote areas with limited access to courts or facing economic difficulties in transportation. Additionally, digital processes can provide greater transparency and efficiency, enabling more effective case tracking. This can be particularly relevant for black individuals who often experience discrimination and inequalities within the justice system. Through the transparency offered by digital processes, accountability can be enhanced, and potential biases reduced. However, it is important to emphasize that the implementation of digital judicial processes must be carefully executed, taking into account the needs and realities of black individuals. It is essential to ensure that all parties have access to the necessary technological resources and that there is no digital exclusion. This requires investments in infrastructure and training programs to ensure that everyone can fully participate in the digital process. Lastly, it is of paramount importance to recognize and address these issues of racial inequality, institutional racism, and digital exclusion of black individuals in order to promote a more just and equitable society. This involves implementing anti-racist policies and practices, promoting diversity and inclusion in institutions, ensuring equal access to education and technology, and empowering black communities through economic and social empowerment. Promoting relational equality is a crucial point and involves implementing policies and practices that aim to eliminate structural and institutional racism, as well as combating prejudiced attitudes and negative stereotypes. Relational equality requires us to acknowledge existing inequalities and implement measures to correct them. This is because different groups may face specific obstacles due to histories of discrimination and marginalization. Therefore, relational equality seeks to ensure justice and fairness, taking into account contextual and historical differences. In this way, digital judicial processes can contribute to a more just and equitable society for black individuals, provided they are implemented with care and inclusion. They can facilitate access to justice, increase transparency, and expedite legal procedures. However, it is necessary to be aware of the challenges and ensure that everyone has equal and relational access to the necessary technological tools |