Tutela jurisdicional e crise no tempo: uma análise do direito fundamental à duração razoável do processo

• Ano de defesa: 2024
• Autor(a) principal: Belucci, Gustavo Henrique Pacheco
• Orientador(a): Lopes, João Batista
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito
• Departamento: Faculdade de Direito
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Processo civil; Efetividade; Duração razoável do processo; Simplificação procedimental; Responsabilidade civil do Estado
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Civil procedure; Effectiveness; Reasonable duration of the process; Procedural simplification; Civil liability of the Government
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
• Link de acesso: https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/41479

This thesis works on the search for procedural effectiveness through the reinterpretation of some procedural institutes. It is known that the Federal Constitution began to guarantee “everyone, in the judicial and administrative sphere, is assured a reasonable duration of the process and the means that guarantee the speed of its processing” (article 5, item LXXVIII), with constitutional amendment 45/2004. Since then, several measures have been implemented to comply with the new fundamental right and guarantee a reasonable processing time for processes. The procedural law has been reformed a dozen times, several institutes have been improved, many others have been reduced, and data from serious research remains unchanged – the population does not believe in justice, nor in the solution through the Judiciary. It is time, therefore, to seek some change in the Justice distribution model, which would attract the parties closer to the solution and time management. An initial diagnosis of the problem will be made, highlighting the multidisciplinary nature of the issue of the reasonable duration of the process, and based on this diagnosis, modifications to the procedure will be suggested, aiming to reduce bureaucracy and bring justice closer to the citizen quickly. To this end, it focused on the issue of expanding the principle of orality, in order to bring together, through spoken and direct communication, the parts of the Judiciary, the need to simplify the procedure and the appeals system, with a new conception of the Judiciary's actions. and improvement of execution, following a global trend of procedural dejudicialization. The hypothesis of holding the State responsible for the slowness of justice will also be considered, as has been done throughout the world, suggesting criteria capable of obtaining satisfaction of this fundamental right that is so violated