Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2015 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Oliveira, Ana Carolina Victalino de
 |
Orientador(a): |
Aurelli, Arlete Inês |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6679
|
Resumo: |
The judicial activism by means of a proactive action of the judges is considered to be necessary for the implementation of the constitutional provision of the reasonable duration of the process. The reasonable duration of the process incorporated in the Brazilian legislation since 1992 with the promulgation of the Pact of San Jose in Costa Rica reached a status of fundamental right with the Constitutional Amendment No. 45 as of 2004 (article 5, LXXVIII of the Federal Constitution). Thus, since the 1990s, the legislative changes have become frequent, especially in the Civil Procedure Code, aiming to ensure the claimants the complete, concrete and satisfactory implementation of law within a reasonable period. In addition to the judicial assistance within a reasonable time, the judicial protection must be effective and not limited to the statement of the law. It is in this context that it is proposed that the judge act in a proactive way in conducting the proceeding, acting as a manager. In this sense, both the constitutional principles and the procedure principles that guide the activity of the judge and the proceeding must be interpreted from the standpoint of the effectiveness of the duration of the proceeding within a reasonable period. Therefore, this research aims to study the action of the judge towards the implementation of the constitutional provision of the reasonable duration of the process, analyzing not only the aspects related to the topic but also indicating certain actions that are expected from the judges in order to observe the constitutional purpose in question. However, this is not a final word on the subject, but just certain ideas to achieve a process with a reasonable duration |