Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2022 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Coelho, Fernanda Marina Feitosa |
| Orientador(a): |
Souza, Sandra Duarte de |
| Banca de defesa: |
Toldy, Teresa Leal de Assunção Martinho,
Cunha, Magali do Nascimento,
Lopes, Marcio Cappelli Aló,
Costa, Emerson Roberto da |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Metodista de Sao Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Ciencias da Religiao
|
| Departamento: |
Ciencias da Religiao:Programa de Pos Graduacao em Ciencias da Religiao
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://tede.metodista.br/jspui/handle/tede/2218
|
Resumo: |
This research deals with the political-religious course against gender in Brazil from the evocation and/or instrumentalization of the discourse of the so-called “gender ideology” in order to hinder an education based on gender in the country. The use of such discourse, mainly by political-religious leaders, creates barriers and makes possible setbacks to the sexual and reproductive rights of the so-called sexual minorities (both women and LGBT people). The analysis was made from the “entry” of the discourse in the country, during the proceedings of the National Education Plan, until the penultimate year of the Jair Messias Bolsonaro government. In order to do so, we verified the different discursive configurations that the term assumed, initially in politics, with the debates of the PNE 2014-2024 and then of the PMEs, later in the media, through speeches of prominent religious leaders and, finally, it presents itself his return to politics, reconfigured in the format of “clichés”, with wide participation in the Bolsonaro discourse. The main objective of the research is to characterize and explain the socio-religious construction of “gender ideology” as well as its discursive transformations in different public spaces, from the PNE to the Bolsonaro government. Our hypothesis is that the discourse of what is conventionally called “gender ideology” could be recurrently alluded to by the candidate Bolsonaro, during the 2018 election, as it was objectified (BERGER, 1985). Through the combination of different methodologies applied in each chapter, namely, literature review, document analysis, survey of legislative proposals and discourse analysis, we present gender as central to inclusive education. We analyze the participation and religious influence in this process, revealing what is hidden with the discourse of “gender ideology” and by discourses based on the same conceptions that socially produce gender phobia. We conclude that the discourse of “gender ideology” did not disappear, but was factually incorporated into the political-religious discourse as being true throughout the analyzed period.(AU) |
