A responsabilidade solidária prevista na Lei 12.846/2013 frente ao fenômeno dos grupos de sociedades.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2017
Autor(a) principal: Kiçula, Diego do Nascimento
Orientador(a): Araujo, Danilo Borges dos Santos Gomes de
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Link de acesso: http://hdl.handle.net/10438/18281
Resumo: The Brazilian Law 12,846/2013 has brought innumerable innovations to Brazilian legal order, creating important mechanisms for the accountability for Companies involved in acts of corruption, or under the terms of the law, in acts contrary to Public Administration. Among these innovations is included the §2 of Article 4 of the AntiCorruption Law, which establishes that the associated companies, controlling companies and controlled companies are jointly and severally liable for compensation for damages and payment of fines caused by a related company. In this sense, the Law seeks to regulate, in its scope, one of the most relevant subjects of modern corporate law. It’s seeks to establish the rules for the application of its sanctions within the context of the Corporate Groups. Indeed, the concern of the national legislature to establish a rule on the subject seems to be legitimate, because this is the recurrent form of organization of large national and multinational companies. It is the analysis of these two institutes that this dissertation takes care wondering: how does the imposition of the solidarity of the law takes place? What is the best interpretation that can be given to the question so that, on the one hand, the law can guarantee the effective application of its sanctions and, on the other hand, the dictates of the legislation does not make impracticable the ventures developed by Corporate Groups. Thus, from the contextualization of the phenomenon of corruption, the innovations brought by the law and it’s practical application until the moment are presented, so that, in the end, the problem brought by the aforementioned §2 of art. 4 of the Law can be identified and then a suggestion of a possible solution to the theme can be made.