Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2022 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
FREITAS, Ana Júlia Rufino de
 |
| Orientador(a): |
FRÉDOU, Flávia Lucena |
| Banca de defesa: |
LIRA, Alex Souza,
OLIVEIRA, Paulo Guilherme Vasconcelos de |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Recursos Pesqueiros e Aquicultura
|
| Departamento: |
Departamento de Pesca e Aquicultura
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/9552
|
Resumo: |
In Brazil, there are no official fisheries statistics to quantitatively assess the status of target and bycatch species. Since food security is at stake, appropriate tools are needed to maintain fisheries sustainability. One widely used "data-poor", despite the critics on its subjectivity, is Productivity and Susceptibility Analysis (PSA). In this study, we use PSA to assess the impact of a northeastern Brazil shrimp fishery which is socioeconomically relevant for the local population but is known to have adverse ecological impacts. The vulnerability status (high, medium, or low) of 30 species was determined by the PSA and compared with three other semi-quantitative approaches that assess stock or extinction risk. The results obtained from the PSA and other methods were partially convergent, highlighting six bycatch and one target species for which management measures or data collection should be prioritized. This study showed that PSA when compared with other semi-quantitative methods, can constitute a valuable preliminary assessment for managing poor-data fisheries. The integrated use of various methods is advisable in diagnosing fishery resources. However, it is essential to understand the peculiarities of each technique to appreciate its applicability and feasibility. |
