Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2014 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
MACÊDO, Patrícia Barros de
 |
| Orientador(a): |
LEÃO, Ana Maria dos Anjos Carneiro |
| Banca de defesa: |
COUTO, Janaína de Albuquerque,
MARTINS, Marcelo Machado,
JÓFILI, Zélia Maria Soares |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ensino das Ciências
|
| Departamento: |
Departamento de Educação
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/7478
|
Resumo: |
Since the early years of schooling, we learn to isolate objects from their environment to reduce the complex to the simple and separate what is on. Thus, hardly perceive the interactions that exist between the parties and its entirety. From another perspective, however, we analyze here the contributions of the Model of Multiple Perspectives (MoMuP) for the construction of systems concepts on food-web human-environment relations. To do so, we choose as the structural axes of the theoretical foundation of the Paradigms of Science (Cartesian, and Complex Systemic) and the Model of Multiple Perspectives (MoMuP). The study included four undergraduates in Biological Sciences UFRPE (the seventh and ninth, n = 2, respectively) and two recent graduates of the same course. The methodological tools used were conceptual schemes in Parking Lot (ECPL), conceptual kit, videos, video recordings and semi-structured interview. The methodological approach consisted in Case presentation and Mini Cases and Systematization (Deconstruction in Mini Cases, using videos War of fire, Primal Connections and Super Size Me/Comments and Thematic Crossings, mediated by the researcher/Reconstruction Case). The initial and final ECPL legacy of a linearity, conceptual gaps and difficult articulation between macro, micro and sub-microscopic levels. These aspects affect the conceptual construction during initial formation. Then we can conclude that this present adapted MoMuP this work enabled the reflection about the biological content and the way of thinking, even if a desired “break” toward a systemic/complex vision is. |
