Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2021 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
SILVA, Camila Cecília da
 |
| Orientador(a): |
LEÃO, Ana Maria dos Anjos Carneiro |
| Banca de defesa: |
LOPES, Fernanda Muniz Brayner,
MUHLE, Rita Paradeda,
FARIAS, Carmen Roselaine de Oliveira |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ensino das Ciências
|
| Departamento: |
Departamento de Educação
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/9198
|
Resumo: |
The present work had as objective to analyze the articulated construction of the concepts that permeate the theme Caatinga Biome, through the Multiple Perspectives Model - Pernambuco (MOMUP-PE), of a group of students of the Degree in Biology, from the interaction between the formal (classroom) and non-formal space, located in the city of Recife. We sought to identify the main difficulties of students in the construction of the concepts that permeate the theme Caatinga Biome in a systemic-complex perspective by developing a pedagogical action plan for teaching the Caatinga Biome from the theoretical and methodological assumptions of MOMUP-PE. verifying if the experience of MOMUP-PE as a theoretical - methodological proposal, can facilitate the learning of concepts related to the Caatinga Biome theme. During the meetings, the class developed 8 conceptual schemes that contributed to the analysis and results of this work. Patrick Charaudeau's Discourse Analysis was used, which deals with the use of language from its use by social subjects in specific socio-historical contexts, based on the linguistic content that seeks to understand the effects of meaning produced by socio-discursive subjects in the practices of language (CHARAUDEAU, 2016). As a result, we observed the different paradigms being used at different times in the conceptual re-elaboration and, finally, from the point of view of semiolinguistics, that there is no compromise in the analysis of the processes involved in the elaboration of concepts, from a systemic-complex perspective. |
