Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2019 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Oliveira, Áxsel Batistella de
 |
Orientador(a): |
Machado, Ironita Adenir Policarpo
 |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade de Passo Fundo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em História
|
Departamento: |
Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas - IFCH
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://tede.upf.br:8080/jspui/handle/tede/2372
|
Resumo: |
The history of the black people in Brazil is not recent, and during the historical process of its constitution there were struggles, resistances and experiences that came to give visibility and guarantee rights to these subjects, who for years were enslaved and stigmatized by the society of the time, causing effects that we still see today, making it necessary to discuss and analyze the issue regarding the right of access to land for quilombola communities. This paper discusses the dichotomies between customary and legal rights concerning the ownership of remaining lands from the quilombo communities in the state of Rio Grande do Sul. In this sense, we seek to contextualize and analyze the land ownership disputes regarding the remaining quilombolas, evaluating the administrative proceedings of the National Institute of Colonization and Agrarian Reform and the Judicial proceedings, cross-referencing with data provided by the Palmares Cultural Foundation and INCRA. In this manner, the formation of quilombola communities with recognized territory in Rio Grande do Sul is contextualized based on the the land occupation process post abolition. Still, it is understood how the concept of land ownership is conceived and applied in INCRA's judicial and administrative processes and what are the conflicts around the land, seeking to see which are the subjects involved and their interrelationships. It also seeks to establish a conceptual and empirical discussion on territoriality, reterritorialization, deterritorialization and land ownership of quilombo remnant people in Rio Grande do Sul using the Identification and Delimitation technical reports to demonstrate the current situation of communities and analyze the extensions of territories. Finally, we discuss what constitutes a collective title and what would be the social function of quilombola property, as well as analyzing and problematizing the consequences of land titling by the constitutional determination of preservation of cultural heritage. |