Eficácia do uso de stents na dacriocistorrinostomia endoscópica: metanálise

• Ano de defesa: 2018
• Autor(a) principal: Orsolini, Maria Julia de Barros
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
• Palavras-chave em Português: dacriocistorrinostomia; endoscópica; sucesso; metanálise; stent; dacryocystorhinotomy; endoscopic; success; meta-analysis
• Link de acesso: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/155848

Objective: To determine if stents increase the success rate of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR-EN) Method: Systematic review of randomized clinical trials of DCR-EN, comparing surgeries performed with and without stents in children older than 10 years of age and adult patients, with primary lacrimo-nasal duct (LND) obstruction. The outcomes were LND patency and adverse events (complications). We searched the databases of Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, PubMed, Lilacs until May 2018. The RevMan 5.3 software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration was used for meta-analysis. Results: Ten studies involving 887 surgeries were included. Five studies were conducted in India, and each of the others were conducted in Canada, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, China and Finland. Lacrimo-nasal duct patency meta-analysis showed stents did not interfere in the chance of success in relation to non-use of the stents to obtain lacrimal viability (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.64, I2 = 0%). It was not possible to perform a meta-analysis regarding the adverse effects and a descriptive analysis was made of the general complications and complications due to the stents. Conclusion: The use or no of stents in DCR-EN probably does not make any difference in the NLD patency. Further studies may better define whether there is a trend toward a better success rate with the use of stent. Key words: dacryocystorhinotomy, endoscopic, stent, success, meta-analysis