Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2014 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Cassemiro, Bruna Montechieze [UNESP] |
Orientador(a): |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/113820
|
Resumo: |
Introduction: periodized resistance training programs are able to create functional, biological and clinical adaptations in their practitioners, however, there are gaps in knowledge regarding the specifics of modalities training and its methods and principles. Objective: To analyze and compare the effects of two periodized resistance training programs between complex motion levers exercise (CMLE) versus conventional exercise (CE) from functional, clinical and biological variables in sedentary women. Methods: The study comprised 29 healthy sedentary women divided into two groups: G1 (n = 15, 23 ± 2.42 years) exposed to training program with CMLE and G2 (n = 14, 22.4 ± 1, 78 years) underwent CE training program. Training was periodized and it was started the 30 sessions over 12 weeks with 3 sessions per week, of which three weeks were to resistance force with load 30-40% of 1RM, 7 weeks to force with load between 50-100% of 1RM and 2 recuperative weeks. For the functional variable was used the 1RM test. For the clinical variables was used Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ), Analogue Visual Scale (AVS), the Pressure Algometer and the Borg Scale... |