Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2010 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Wilhelm, Vandiana Borba
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Nogueira, Francis Mary Guimarães
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Parana
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação stricto sensu em Educação
|
| Departamento: |
Sociedade, Estado e Educação
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/handle/tede/916
|
Resumo: |
This paper has as study object, the politics comparison of the special education in Brazil and in Venezuela, by the analysis of the historical trajectory of the concepts and legal basis. Using the study comparison technique, the objective is to identify and explain the contrasts and similarities in the historical evolution of the search object. In consonance to the theoretical perspective which education is based, the education has not an autonomous or hegemonic character, wherefore it can not be analyzed out of the social viewpoint where it is inserted. On this direction, the paper begins with the analysis of the changes in the material basis, occasioned by the neoliberal reforms, because in this period, Latin America suffered from intense political, economic and social changes, occasioned by the conditionality to the renegotiation of the external debt and adhesion to the guidelines of Washington consensus. In this context, Brazil and Venezuela are inserted, each one with particularities about the Neoliberalism diffusion and its actual context. In sequence of this paper, it seeks to make articulations with educational reforms, once the material base changes focused in the education of the countries above cited, in a mediated way. In Brazil, related to the objectives to get through the educational reform, the study has center in the universalization of basic education, action which was necessary the incorporation of marginalized groups to school, focusing the people with special needs in this context. In Venezuela, an opposite situation occurs, because the emphasis has been in the decentralization process and Public Education privatization, getting thousand of people out of school, even though within or without special needs. After describing these elements and highlighting the application of this process in special education, the central search object appears: the comparison of enounced elements. First of all in Brazil, the route starts in the historical trajectory, addressing the practices that mark the special education construction as a State politics: the institutionalization, integration and inclusion, allowing to make a concept analysis, and within the theoretical elaboration, the same exercise in relation to the legal base. With the data collected, in the third chapter, within the discussion about special education in Venezuela, the comparison was made. Among the differential elements of this comparison study, some topics may be highlighted: the non-existence of the deinstitutionalization, that Brazil passed in the final of the 50's, as wells as the concept of inclusion that in Venezuela was not linked to the education of people with special needs, but it was used from 2003 on in the named "Social Missions", which are directed to attend the elementary needs of the whole poor population, being related to special education, in 2007 the inclusion concept was then used simultaneously to the integration concept, that differently from Brazil, conceptually, they do not conflict. Many similarities were found, being able to highlight the creation of instances that were responsible for planning and coordinating the special education politics in national context in 70's decade. |
