A questão da linguagem na filosofia de Popper

• Ano de defesa: 2014
• Autor(a) principal: Persegueiro, Antônio Carlos
• Orientador(a): Schorn, Remi
• Banca de defesa: Gallina, Albertinho Luiz , Penna-forte, Marcelo do Amaral
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná; Toledo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Mestrado em Filosofia
• Departamento: Centro de Ciências Humanas e Sociais
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Linguagem; Filosofia; Popper
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Language; Philosophy; Popper
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA
• Link de acesso: http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/handle/tede/2060

This Dissertation addresses the problem of language in Popper s philosophy. Our theses is that Popper (1902 1994), exponent of epistemology and philosophy of science, offers contributions aimed at the best form of use and improving language comprehension. Differently from other authors, he doesn t focus the issue on a single book, he inserts it in reviews and pronouncements, mostly associated with the theory of knowledge and related themes. So, our research activity constitutes in a theoretical gold-digging . Since the thirties, Popper adopts the kantian objectivity while guided by readings, oral and written presentations. However, it is emphasized that Popper considering, preserving and bringing to the agenda crucial problems to the human being, sustains the beginning of all rational discussion based in cosmology. Meaning, that from the questions related to the universe and the world, above all its beginning, the others are derived. In this context, we highlight the integrated conception of knowledge, in which rationalism, empiricism and metaphysical contents are dependent and complementary. His indeterministic conception of the world articulates itself with a pluralistic theses of reality: the three worlds, the material, the subjective and the objective world are real and interact linguistically. The innovation lies in the reciprocity between these worlds, which takes place therefore in the language. In the difference of the philosophy of language currently, Popper abstains himself from verifying the meaning, the definitions and the evolution (or involution) of terms. He entails to analyze the language in a way as to privilege its functions, uses, detection of mistakes and enunciative depuration, making it, therefore, reflected and enhanced. He notes that current scientific knowledge brings in it sentential orders demands, which philosophy can t escape. The work shows that Popper indicates that language in the uncontrollable instance and it is favorable to critical debate, besides being the instrument relevant to the correct inferences, denials, definitions, sentential rearrangements, favorable, finally, to the expansion of what man knows or modestly thinks to know about himself and the world presently tripartite and multi-relational.