Teoria política contemporânea e regulação dos meios de comunicação. Um estudo a partir da Lei de Serviços de Comunicação Audiovisual nº 26.522

• Ano de defesa: 2020
• Autor(a) principal: Barboza, Marcio Rodrigues [UNIFESP]
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
• Palavras-chave em Português: Contemporary Political Theory; Regulation Of The Media; Law Of Means; Teoria Política Contemporânea; Regulação Dos Meios De Comunicação; Lei De Meios
• Link de acesso: https://sucupira.capes.gov.br/sucupira/public/consultas/coleta/trabalhoConclusao/viewTrabalhoConclusao.jsf?popup=true&id_trabalho=9706309; https://hdl.handle.net/11600/64703

The Audiovisual Communication Services Law No. 26522, approved by the Argentine State in 2009, generated, even before its approval, passionate debates between those who defend the legal framework, understanding it as an important instrument for the democratization of the media and those who maintain that the law, paradoxically, is a way of restricting freedom of expression and the press. In this dissertation, the law of means and the discussion around it were analyzed based on contemporary political theory, represented here mainly by John Rawls and by the neo-collectivist authors Cass Sunstein and Owen Fiss. The gap in the bibliography in relation to a Brazilian master's thesis that addresses the media law based on this type of theoretical framework is one of the justifications of this research. Based on the analysis of the discussion around the media law in the Argentine context, also using the direct study of the articles of the law that generated the most controversies, we conclude that the “deconcentrating” proposal of the legal framework, at least from the normative point of view , presents itself as a more attractive regulation alternative in view of the available alternatives represented by the centralized state regulation or by the self-regulated market system if, and only if, there is inspection by civil society and independent State institutions, such as the Judiciary, regarding the law enforcement means.