Efeito da riboflavina tópica exposta à irradiação ultravioleta A e inserção de segmentos de anéis corneanos intraestromais para ceratocone

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2012
Autor(a) principal: Renesto, Adimara da Candelaria [UNIFESP]
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Tese
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/9359
Resumo: Purpose: To report the impression cytologic results after corneal cross-linking and insertion of intrastromal corneal ring segments for keratoconus. Methods: Thirty-nine eyes were distributed into two groups: 1) cross-linking group (patients underwent corneal cross-linking procedure), and 2) riboflavin eyedrops group (patients received riboflavin 0.1% (w/v) eyedrops in 20% dextran solution for 1 month). After 3 months, all patients underwent insertion of intrastromal corneal ring segments. Impression cytologic specimens were obtained from all eyes at baseline, at 1 month and 3 months after cross-linking or riboflavin eyedrops, and again at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after intrastromal corneal ring segment insertion. Results: Patients in the cross-linking group demonstrated improvement in the cell-to-cell contact of epithelial cells and the nucleusto- cytoplasm ratio on the temporal conjunctiva after treatment (P = 0.008 and P = 0.047), respectively. On the superior conjunctiva, increases in goblet cell density (P = 0.037) and level of organization of nuclear chromatin (P = 0.010) after treatment were noted. Patients in the riboflavin eyedrops group demonstrated improvement in the cellto- cell contact of epithelial cells on the superior conjunctiva after treatment (P = 0.021). On the temporal conjunctiva, an improvement in the cell-to-cell contact of epithelial cells (P < 0.001) and increases in the nucleus-to-cytoplasm ratio (P < 0.001), goblet cell density (P = 0.001), and less keratinization (P = 0.011) were noted. No changes were identified on the cornea for either group. Fisher’s exact test comparison of the impression cytologic total scores after treatment revealed no difference between groups. Conclusion: Despite changes in some conjunctival parameters (e.g., cell-tocell contact of epithelial cells, nucleus-to-cytoplasm ratio, level of organization of nuclear chromatin , goblet cell density, and keratinization), comparison of the total impression cytologic scores revealed no difference between groups.