Descaminhos das escrituras antropológicas da dor

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2020
Autor(a) principal: Ribeiro, Michelli De Souza [UNIFESP]
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: https://sucupira.capes.gov.br/sucupira/public/consultas/coleta/trabalhoConclusao/viewTrabalhoConclusao.jsf?popup=true&id_trabalho=9525903
https://hdl.handle.net/11600/64690
Resumo: This work seeks to present some of the particularities of ethnographic work located in ethnographic regions tensioned by the consequences of State violence perpetrated during the civil-military dictatorship in Brazil (1964-1985) and military dictatorship in Argentina (1976-1983). It took as an ethnographic field what, in the course of my master's research, I named as anthropological writings on pain, that is, the analysis of ethnographic texts that embody memories and experiences of mourning, pain and suffering experienced by victims and/or relatives of victims of state violence and witnessed by anthropologists in the field. Observing the trails, the gaps and folds of the speeches and narratives of these texts, it questioned the moral and emotional effects of these research experiences on the researchers, paying attention to the way these moral and emotional reactions to pain and vulnerabilities of others unfolded on ethical and epistemological issues for the field of anthropological research thus situated. The connections made between these texts throughout the research were thus subsidized by an analysis focused on the peculiarities of the values, feelings and moralities that cross the daily relations established between anthropologists and their interlocutors in the course of field research, and the moral agency of suffering that seems to be implicated in the possible compromises of various orders - moral, emotional and political - of these researchers in relation to the demands for empathy and recognition of those who suffer and occupy the public sphere with their suffering, claiming truth, justice and reparation for their pain.