O Neopirronismo De Robert Fogelin: Reflexões Sobre História Do Ceticismo E Epistemologia
Ano de defesa: | 2018 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Link de acesso: | https://sucupira.capes.gov.br/sucupira/public/consultas/coleta/trabalhoConclusao/viewTrabalhoConclusao.jsf?popup=true&id_trabalho=7190549 https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/52590 |
Resumo: | This Work Is Divided Into Two Parts. The First Part Is Called History Of Skepticism And Neo-Pyrrhonism And The Second Part Is Called Neo-Pyrrhonic"S Epistemology. The First Part Is Concerned With How Fogelin"S Neo-Pyrrhonism Was Formulated And What Are The Main Names Behind His Neo-Pyrrhonic"S Skepticism, Namely The Ancient Pyrrhonians, David Hume And Ludwig Wittgenstein. Thus, The First Part Of The Work, Divided Into Four Chapters, Traces The Relation Of The Fogelian Thought To The Skeptical Thought Found In The History Of Philosophy. One Of The Main Ideas Defended In The First Part Of This Research Is That Its Neo-Pyrrhonism, Besides Depending On Many Teachings Found In The Writings Of The Ancient Pyrrhonians, Also Depends On These Other Authors, Showing Their Influence Is As Fundamental As That Of The Pyrrhonians, Assuming Even The Role Main Part Of Its Reflection. Having Drawn A Profile Of The Influences Of His Position, The Second Part Has The Pretension To Analyze And Defend Fogelin"S Neo-Pyrrhonism Ina |