Compostagem de lodo de uma estação de tratamento de efluentes sanitários

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2018
Autor(a) principal: Pereira, Heron da Silva
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brasil
Engenharia Ambiental
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Ambiental
Centro de Tecnologia
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/19447
Resumo: Due to the development of environmental technologies, sewage and effluent treatment has become increasingly efficient in the removal of pollutants. As a result, loads of xenobiotics are removed from the wastewater. In another words, a greater amount of sludge is removed from the effluent. This sludge has distinct characteristics, varying in region and type of sewage treatment, moreover, it has potential to be reused as organic fertilizers. However, in order to be used for this purpose, sewage sludge needs to pass over a process of elimination of pathogens and stabilization of other physical-chemical parameters, and composting is a technique that makes this treatment viable. The purpose of this dissertation was to evaluate the composting process of a sewage treatment plant, in order to obtain a compost that complies with current legislation to be used in agricultural soil. Four treatments were tested: T1- Aerobic sludge + wood shaving; T2- Aerobic sludge + wood shaving + monzogranite; T3- Aerobic sludge + wood shavings + sugarcane bagasse; T4- Aerobic sludge + sugarcane bagasse + monzogranite. The composting lasted 90 days and the main physical-chemical parameters described in the Brazilian legislation were analyzed. The study showed that sugarcane bagasse and monzogranite improved composting, and that all treatments had significant removal of pathogens established in CONAMA Resolution No. 375/2006. However, the process did not comply with CONAMA Resolution No. 481/2017 in terms of temperatures.