Entre gestações/partos humanizados e violência obstétrica : subjetividades em movimento

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2015
Autor(a) principal: Batista, Priscilla Daisy Cardoso
Orientador(a): Melo, Liliana da Escóssia
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Sergipe
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Pós-Graduação em Psicologia Social
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Brasil
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: https://ri.ufs.br/handle/riufs/6017
Resumo: This study aims to analyze health practices that support obstetric violence as a legal possession right by the medical-scientific knowledge-power of bodies, sexual and reproductive processes of women during their pregnancies and labor. This appropriation is a particular configuration in health care, in which the risk discourse embedded in this kind of knowledge-power that highlights biological factors, pathologizing and fragmented, making it the only way to manage the risk during pregnancy and childbirth, rather than expansion of autonomy, act producing docile bodies in the sense used by the philosopher Michel Foucault. I seek to relate relationships between risk concepts with medical and hospital discursive practices, marked by the logic of maximum production profits in the shortest time and built the scientific truth of value-legitimize the interventions on the bodies-of-women that acts reinforcing a dispossession of pregnancies and births. Expanding the locus of obstetric violence beyond the hospital, we identify their presence in some prenatal care practices in both the public or private health sector. It also emphasize gender concepts, body, human sexuality and reproduction, all common topics in our society , working in naturalization and perpetuation of obstetric violence as gender-based violence against women ;that are pregnant or have children. We also question a certain understanding of humanized birth and their individualizing, statist or marketing shots, which tend to take you to a land in which the role of women is narrowly. By endorsing labor humanisation, social movements and public policies give other senses about issues related to women's health, in which obstetric violence is of them; this notoriety, however, must be transformed into specific actions to be implemented to not only identify and criminalize those who practice obstetric violence, but also to incorporate workers, managers and users of health systems in order to exercise their protagonists to others, linking relations, accountability and sharing decisions about ways to gestate and give birth. The path of this research was born in intervention research as a methodology. in which the relationship between search object and the search engine are related by implication, that is, the ability to produce changes to each other. So, I bring experiences as a mother, activist of the Movement for Birth Humanization (MBH) woman medical health officer, medical school teacher, and the health system user; roles that mix, transform and dialogue to the practice of research involved, designing research in social, ethical and aesthetic commitment.